Contax Zeiss 100mm f3.5 For Macro Photography

I’m not sure how many extension tubes I’d have to add to actually get the lens to 1:1 for true macro photography; nonetheless, you can definitely add an extension tube and come out with some great results. Here is a flower shot I took with an 18mm extension tube attached to the lens.

Contax Zeiss 100mm f3.5 @ f8 with an 18mm extension tube. Unedited.

Below is a crop of the stamen:

Contax Zeiss 100mm f3.5 @ f8 with an 18mm extension tube. Unedited. Cropped.

The colors are excellent, typical Zeiss straight out of the camera. The black areas are deep and specular highlights have no chromatic aberration. Excellent detail. I’d be happy using this combination anytime I need to get a bit closer to the subject. Without the 18mm extension tube the lens has a minimum focusing distance of 3ft. With the 18mm extension tube it brings it down to roughly 21 inches, a little less than half the distance.

My makeshift MFD measurement:

XQD card holder next to tape measurer at minimum focusing distance.

I used ImageJ to make a new MFD calculation. I knew the XQD card that fits in the card holder has a long edge of 38.5mm. Using the inside edges of the plastic I was able to set the pixel to mm ratio in ImageJ and obtain a cross sectional measurement of the full image, and then divided by 35mm. That puts the MFD of this lens with an 18mm extension tube at 1:3.98. Basically 1:4. Certainly not macro. If someone would like to download my image and check my math that would be great. I may make another post actually getting the lens to 1:1 with enough extension tubes but I’m not sure how usable the images would be.

All-in-all, I definitely will be using extension tubes with this lens because the images produced are outstanding. They’re not macro but they’re a lot closer than the 1m (3f) native MFD of the lens.

Update: I added another extension tube (11mm) for a total of 29mm, and a new MFD of 1:3. I’d like to get even closer but my other extension tubes are for Nikon F-mount so I have no more to stack. The image is still nice and sharp since extension tubes don’t really add aberrations. They will decrease the amount of light hitting the sensor by a good amount depending how many you use, but that’s math for another day.

CONTAX 100mm f3.5 with 29mm of extension tubes.

Black and White Photography with CONTAX Zeiss Lenses

Today I spent some time with an old friend. I took along the CONTAX Zeiss 28-85mm f3.3-4 because it was going to be a hike into the unknown and I like the zoom range the lens offers. My friend has recently become the owner of a brand new Triumph motorcycle, and I figured what better way than to capture this nostalgic beast than with a great nostalgic lens. We took a bunch of candid shots but as I’m writing this I realize I didn’t get his model release so here’s a pic of the bike 🙂

CONTAX Zeiss 28-85mm f3.3-4 B&W Motorcycle
CONTAX 28-85mm f3.3-4 shot at 50mm wide open. Profile: Adobe Monochrome.

The 28-85mm really is like having a bag of primes in one lens. The micro contrast of Zeiss lenses really shows itself in black and white photography. Some shoot in black and white in camera, but I tend to shoot raw and convert to black and white in Adobe Lightroom. I like having the color photo as well. Could a newer lens achieve these results? Sure, but where’s the fun in that? Here’s a modern Triumph paying homage to another era, shot on a modern Nikon Z6, paying homage to another era with the CONTAX Zeiss 28-85mm. How cool is that! What a fun day.

Macro Photography with Contax Zeiss Lenses

This week I’ll be trying out an assortment of Contax Zeiss lenses to see how well they perform for macro photography. Years ago I produced some stunning results so this should be interesting. I use extension tubes followed by the Nikon Z to C/Y adapter. The image below is from the Contax Zeiss 28-85mm f3.3-4 lens a few years ago.

CONTAX Zeiss 28-85mm with extension tubes for macro photography.

Update: Took some test shots with the CONTAX Zeiss 100mm f3.5 and 18mm extension tube. It didn’t reach 1:1, only 1:4, but the images were excellent.